Пример готовой курсовой работы по предмету: Лингвистика
Plan
I.Introduction…………………………………………………………… 3
II.Interjection as a linguistic unit
2.1Definition of interjections……………………………………… ..4
2.2Forms and morphological features of interjections……………….8
2.3Position and meaning of interjections…………………………… 12
III.Use of interjections in English language……………………………….16
IV.Conclusion………………………………………………………………28
V.References ………………………………………………………………29
Содержание
Выдержка из текста
The topicality is explained by the profound interest to the peculiarities of this or that concept realization means as well as idiomatic and non- idiomatic fixed phrases in the English and Russian languages.
Syntactic change of a word meaning affects grammar in its morphological and syntactic aspects and is seen as gradual, the product of chain reactions and subject to cyclic drift. The view that creole languages are the product of catastrophism is heavily disputed.
The purpose of this work — to study features of word order in the English and Italian sentence. To reveal the influence of inversion on the meaning and stylistic nuance of the sentence in both languages;
Lexical meaning of every word depends upon the part of speech to which the word belongs. Every word may be used in a limiting set of syntactical functions, and with the definite valency. It has a definite set of grammatical meanings, and a definite set of forms.
They believe that every individual is unique, completely and marvellously unique totally different from all other individuals and therefore, particularly precious and wonderful. Americans think they are more individualistic in their thoughts and actions than they really are. They take pride in claiming more individualism than in fact, they actually have.
The topicality of the research is explained by the profound interest of the modern linguists in the linguacultural aspect of the phraseological units and the numerals taken separately. In our research we combine these two language units, because, according to our provisional hypothesis, the numerals in the phraseological units show the linguacultural specifics being closely related to the mentality of the nation.
References
1.Ameka, F. K. Interjections [Text]
/ In Ostman, J.-O. &Verschueren, J. (Eds.) Handbook of Pragmatics. – Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2006.
2.Crystal, D. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics [Text]
/ D. Crystal. — Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 2008.
3.Curme, G. O. English Grammar [Text]
/ Curme. Barnes & Noble Books, New York, 1978.
4.Dunbar, R. Theory of mind and the evolution of language [Text]
/ In Knight C., Hurford, J., Studdert-Kennedy, M. The Evolutionary Emergence of Language: Social Function and the Origins of Linguistic Form. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
5.Eckersley, C. E., Macaulay, M. Brighter Grammar [Text]
/ C. E. Eckersley, M. Macaulay. – London: Longman, 2005.
6.Goffman, E. A Reply to Denzin and Keller [Text]
/ E. Goffman. / Ed. by G.A. Fine, G. Smith. – Vol. 4 – L: Sage Publications, 2000.
7.Jovanovic, V. Z. The Form, Position and Meaning of Interjections in English[Text]
/ V. Z. Jovanovic. — Linguistics and Literature, 2004.
8.Quirk, R. A Contemporary Grammar of English [Text]
/ R. Quirk. – Longman group, London, 1972.
9.Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, J. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language [Text]
/ R. Quirk, J. Greenbaum. – London: Longman, 1985.
10. Rey, G. Contemporary Philosophy of Mind: A Contentiously Classical Approach[Text]
/ G. Rey. – Blackwell, 2000.
11.Richards, J., Schmidt, R. W. Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics [Text]
/ J. Richards, R. W. Schmidt. – Pearson Education Limited, 2002.
12.Sapir, E. Language. An Introduction to the Study of Speech[Text]
/ E. Sapir. – London,2004.
13.Sledd J. A Short Introduction to English Grammar [Text]
/ J. Sledd. – Chicago, 2003.
14.The PenguinDictionary of English Grammar [Text].
– Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, 2000.
15.Trask, R. L. Language and Linguistics[Text]
/ R. L. Trask. – London,2007.
16.Wierzbicka, A. Emotions Across Languages and Cultures: Diversity and Universals[Text]
/A. Wirzbicka. – Cambridge University Press, 2002.
17.Wierzbicka, A.The semantics of interjection [Text]
/ A. Wirzbicka. — Journal of Pragmatics, 1992.
18.Wilkins, D. Interjections as deictics [Text]
/ D. Wilkins. — Journal of Pragmatics, 1992.
19.Wilson, D, Sperber, D. Pragmatics, Modularity and Mind-reading [Text]
/ D. Wilson, D. Sperber. – Mind and Language, 2001.
20.Zandvoort, R. W. A Handbook of English Grammar [Text]
/ In Approaches and Methods in Language Teachingby Jack C. Richards and Theodore S. Rodgers. – Cambridge Language Teaching Library, 2001.
список литературы
