Пример готовой курсовой работы по предмету: Языки (переводы)
Содержание
This work was performed in the plane of the intersection of linguistics, stylistics, and grammar and devoted to the study of such opposition as writing and speaking.
The importance and actuality of this study is determined by the constant interest to the grammar opposition: writing and speaking, the desire to delve deeper into the nature of the speaking and writing appearance and also the wish to find as much peculiar features of these two forms of speech as possible. Speech is an integral part of the social life of people, a necessary condition for the existence of human society. It is a necessary condition of human cognitive activity.
The object of our study is main peculiarities and differences of the oral and written speech.
1.1 History of the literature language. Appearance of the speaking and writing
Since the 18th century, observations were made on the bonds between different languages, on the composition of the literary language, similarity and differences between languages.
The creation of the "Grammar" was extremely important for understanding of the specificity of the literary language [4, p. 18].
The question of the origin of the literary language is still not resolved by the experts, and more than that, they claim that the final decision is not close.
Such interest to the problem of the origin of the literary language can be explained by the fact that the whole concept of its future development, the formation of the national literary language in 17 -19 centuries depends on the particular understanding of the formation of the ancient literary language
1.2 The problem of the differentiation between the writing and the speaking
At first glance, the decision of the question about the delimitation of oral and written texts is not difficult. If we take into the consideration, the material form of the sign, the speaking is always easily distinguished from the writing: speaking is realized in the form of the material sound and is perceived acoustically and the written language is realized in the form of graphic material and is perceived visually.
2 OPPOSITION: WRITING AND SPEAKING
2.1 The characteristic features of the speaking
In XXth century such discipline as colloqualistic appeared, or in other words it is the theory of conversational speech — one of the most interesting, important and at the same time difficult for studying kinds of speech. It contributed to the comprehensive analysis of the conversational speech. Colloqualistic is closely associated with the syntax.
Выдержка из текста
This work was performed in the plane of the intersection of linguistics, stylistics, and grammar and devoted to the study of such opposition as writing and speaking.
The importance and actuality of this study is determined by the constant interest to the grammar opposition: writing and speaking, the desire to delve deeper into the nature of the speaking and writing appearance and also the wish to find as much peculiar features of these two forms of speech as possible. Speech is an integral part of the social life of people, a necessary condition for the existence of human society. It is a necessary condition of human cognitive activity.
The object of our study is main peculiarities and differences of the oral and written speech.
Список использованной литературы
Bibliography
1. Akmajian A. An Introduction to the Principles of Transformational Syntax. – NY: MIT Press, 1975. — P. 90.
2. Arlotto A. Introduction to Historical Linguistics. – NY: MIT Press, 1999. – P. 74.
3. Baron D. Grammar and Gender. – NY: Yale University Press, 2001. – P. 154.
4. Bellugi U. Learning the language. — West Virginia: Speech Communication Press, 2011. – P. 86.
5. Boltz, W. Language and Writing. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. — P.123.
6. Bubnova G.I., Garbovsky N. К. Written and oral communication: syntax and prosody. — М., 1991. P. 8.
7. Christopher, Norris, Deconstruction: Theory and Practice. — London: Methuen, 1982. P. 18.
8. Cook W. Case Grammar Theory. – George: Georgetown University Press, 2013. — P. 187.
9. Crawford M. Talking Difference. — George: Georgetown University Press, 2013. — P.287.
10. Derrida J. Of Grammatology. — Baltimore: JHU Press, 1998. — P. 452.
11. Diamond A. S. The History and the Origin of Language. – NY: MIT Press, 2010. – P.87.
12. Evans J. C. Strategies of deconstruction: Derrida and the myth of the voice.- Minneapolis: U of Minnesota Press, 2003. — P. 224.
13. Fasold R. W.The sociolinguistics of language. — Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2003. — P. 352.
14. Fromkin V.A. Grammatical aspects of speech errors. – NY: MIT Press, 2002. – P.54.
15. Galperin I.R. Stylistic of English language. – Moscow: Science, 2005. P. 67.
16. Galperin I.R. Text as a a subject of stylistic researches . – Moscow: Science, 2005. P. 90.
17. Goldwasser, O. How the Alphabet Was Born from Hieroglyphs — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. — P.201.
18. Hogan P. C. Philosophical approaches to the study of literature. — Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2000. — P. 384.
19. Holme R. Literacy: an introduction. — Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2004. — P. 280.
20. Ivashkin М.P. The practice of English Stylistic. — М.: АSТ, 2007. P. 112.
21. Кrilova О.А. Linguistic stylistic. — М.: High School, 2008. – P. 120.
22. Leschenko Т.P. Stylistic and speech culture. – М.: High School, 2010. – P. 105.
23. Lewis, M. P.. Ethnologue (16th ed.).
— Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 2003. — P. 87.
24. Maximov V.I. Russia and culture. — М.: Gardariki, 2004. – P. 98.
25. Mayell, H. When did "modern" behavior emerge in humans? – Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2011. – P. 98.
26. McCroskey, J. C., Wrench, J. S., & Richmond, V. P. (2003).
Principles of public speaking. Indianapolis, IN: The College Network, 2003. – P. 65.
27. Naer V.L. Stylistic and Pragmatic. — М.: МGLU, 2002. P.218.
28. Noah S. The Origin and Development of the Cuneiform System of Writing. — New York: Simon & Schuster, 2008. – P. 381– 383.
29. Ong W. J. Literacy and Orality in Our Times. — Davis: Psychology Press, 2004. — P. 272.
30. Ong W. J. Orality and literacy: the technologizing of the word. — New York: Psychology Press, 2004. — P. 232.
31. Razinkina, N.М. The functional stylistic — М. High school, 2009. — P. 182.
32. Razinkina, N.М. The functional stylistic — М. High school, 2009. — P. 182.
33. Rudgley R. The Lost Civilizations of the Stone Age. — New York: Simon & Schuster, 2010. — P. 48– 57.
34. Sarup M. An introductory guide to post-structuralism and postmodernism. — Athens: University of Georgia Press, 2006. — P. 240.
35. Searle J. R. The Word Turned Upside Down. – NY: The New York Review of Books, 2007. – P. 345.
36. Weiss A. Money Talks. — West Virginia: Speech Communication Press, 2001. – P. 112.
37. Womack M.M. Speech for foreign students. — West Virginia: Speech Communication Press, 2006. – p. 140.
38. Wrench, J. S., McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. Human communication in everyday life: Explanations and applications. — Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 2008. — P. 304.
39. Zakahi W. Communication Education. — West Virginia: Speech Communication Press, 1988. – P. 91.
40. Znamenskaya Т.А. Stylistic of English language. — М.: KomBook, 2006. – P.224.
