Пример готового реферата по предмету: Английский продвинутый
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction…………………………………………………………………… 2
Part 1. Evolution of university governance types 3
Part 2. Rating of British universities in 2014. 9
Part 3. Comparative analysis of top ten universities of Great Britain 12
Conclusion 25
Содержание
Выдержка из текста
Relevance of research is caused by that the set of universities which are ready to provide training services opens now. It should be noted also that many of them successfully come to the international level and can accept foreign students educating them the international level. However at all positive lines of modern universities, they have also negative sides. They have no such quality assurance, as at ancient universities of Great Britain, in particular Oxbridge. In this regard there is actual a studying of distinctive features of old British universities from modern analogs.
There is … table and bookshelves there. His sons are … students of the University. … two cups and a spoon in the box.
Pressing social problems such as racism, unemployment, unhealthy lifestyles, intolerance, discrimination against minorities, gender inequality and lack of integration for people with disabilities pose significant challenges both for the present and the next generation.
The emergence of the NIS concept can be traced back to works of Freeman and Lundvall in the mid 1980s. The NIS framework suggests that the “research system’s ultimate goal is innovation and that the system is part of a larger system composed of sectors like government, university and industry and their environment” (Godin, 2007).
It was also noted by Nelson(1993) that this “set of institutions and their interactions determine the innovative performance of national firms”.
While most families are traditional, comprising a father, a mother and one or more children some of them are headed by one parent, usually a woman. These childless couples may believe that they would not make good parents, they may want freedom from the responsibilities of children; or perhaps, they are not physically able to have children.
The introduction of modern logistics management at the enterprise provides: reduction of inventory and the associated capital, high availability of goods to delivery, reducing lead times and improving quality, increasing production flexibility, reduced production costs, to accelerate the turnover of capital. This ensures reduction of production costs and improving the quality of supply — a decisive competitive advantage in the Russian market.
Lexical meaning of every word depends upon the part of speech to which the word belongs. Every word may be used in a limiting set of syntactical functions, and with the definite valency. It has a definite set of grammatical meanings, and a definite set of forms.
The urgency of the present research is determined by the general orientation of the modern paradigms of English phraseological units and fixed phrases, which make intercultural communication tremendously difficult and lead from time to time to communication failure.
So as to provide the theoretical basis required concerning discourse theories, functional style distinctive features, stylistic and semantic categories of expressivity, evaluation and emotionality, use of various tropes we refer to the latest linguistic theories developed by a number of researchers, whose investigations are referred to in the bibliography further on.
References
1. Joint Statement on London Metropolitan University. (2009) Higher Education Funding Councilfro England. [Online].
Available from: http://www.hefce.ac.uk/news/hefce/2009/lmu.htm.
2. Beesemyer, L. (2006)Who runs Oxford?: an examination of the university’s governance structures. Thesis (M.Sc. Higher Education)-University of Oxford, 2006.
3. Boggs, A.M. (2007)Ontario’s Royal Commission on the University of Toronto, 1905-1906:Political and historical factors that influenced the final report of the Flavelle Commission. Master of Arts. University of Toronto.
4. Doern, B. (2008)»Polytechnics» in Higher Education Systems: a comparative review and policyimplications for Ontario. Toronto ON: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario.
5. Evans, G.R. (2009) And now what about reforming Cambridge governance? Higher Education Review, 41 (2), pp. 3-22.
6. Evans, G.R. (2007) The Oxford governance debate: HEFCE and the wider implications. Higher Education Review, 39 (3), pp. 3-26.
7. Fallis, G. (2007) Multiversities, ideas and democracy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
8. Flexner, A. (1968) Universities: American, English, German.London UK: Oxford UniversityPress.
9. Griffiths, S. (2009) John Hood: This place needed a shake-up — the outgoing Oxford vice-chancellor reveals why he was right to take on the dons.The Times. [Online].
Availablefrom: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/education/article 6688617.ece.
10. Halsey, A.H. (1995) Decline of Donnish Dominion: the British academicprofessions in thetwentieth century.first ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
11. Hodges, L. and Garner, R. (2009) London Met warned that it could be closed.The Independent.[Online].
Available from: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/education-news/london-met-warned-that-it-could-be-closed-1835511.html >.
12. Labi, A. (2007)The U. of Oxford Projects Unity After Rejecting Governance Changes.Washington DC: The Chronicle of Higher Education.Lubenow, W.C. (2000) University History and the History of Universities in the NineteenthCentury.The Journal of British Studies,39 (2), pp. 247-262.
13. MacLeod, D. (2009)Cambridge dons retain control of university.The Guardian. [Online].
Available from: <http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2009/mar/20/cambridge-dons-control>.
14. McKillop, A.B. (1994) Matters of the Mind: the university in Ontario 1791-1951.
15. first ed.Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
16. Nardi, P. (1992) Relations with Authority. In A History of the University in Europe: Universitiesin the Middle Ages., eds. W. Ruegg andH. de Ridder-Symoens,Cambridge UK: CambridgeUniversity Press, pp. 77-107.
17. Newman, J.H. (1960)The Idea of a University.4th ed. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart andWinston.
18. Newman, M. (2007)Oxford v-c to go but reform still on the agenda.Times Higher EducationSupplement. [Online].
Available from:<http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=311206§ioncode=26.Pratt, J. (1997)The Polytechnic Experiment, 1965-1992.Buckingham UK: The Society forResearch into Higher Education & Open University Press.
19. Rothblatt, S. (1997)The modern university and its discontents : the fate of Newman’s legacies in Britain and America.Cambridge: Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
20. Rudolf, F. (1990)The American College and University: a history.second ed. Athens, GA:University of Georgia Press.
21. Ruegg, W. (1996) Themes. In A History of the University in Europe: Universities in Early Modern Europe (1500-1800).
Ed. H. De Ridder-Symoens, First ed. Cambridge UK:Cambridge University Press, pp. 3-42.
22. Schwinges, R.C. (1992) Student Education, Student Life. In A History of the University in Europe: universities in the middle ages., ed. H. De Ridder-Symoens,Cambridge UK:Cambridge University Press, pp. 195-242.
23. Shattock, M. (2006) Managing good governance in higher education.Maidenhead: OpenUniversity Press.Tapper, T. and Palfreyman, D. (2002) Understanding collegiality: the changing Oxbridge model.Tertiary Education and Management,8, pp. 47-63.
24. Tapper, T. and Palfreyman, D. (2000)Oxford and the Decline of the Collegiate Tradition.London UK: Woburn Press.
25. Thelin, J.R. (2004) A History of American Higher Education.first ed. Baltimore, MD: JohnsHopkins University Press.
26. University of Oxford (2006)White Paper on University Governance.Oxford UK: OxfordUniversity Gazette.
27. University of Oxford (2005)Oxford’s Governance Structure: a green paper.
28. Oxford UK: OxfordUniversity Gazette.
список литературы
